Prepared for your firm
This deck walks the administrative portal in the order you meet it — the case list, opening a recourse, and each of the eight sections of a file. Ten decision types, six grounds of annulment under Article 146, and the one clock that decides whether any of it matters.
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Every screen that follows is the product · → to advance · N shows or hides the notes
§01 · The home screen
A sidebar that stays, and a working area beside it.
Administrative practice has one failure mode that ends the case before it starts: the 75-day window under Article 146 §3. So the list does not show “open matters” — it shows how long is left on each of them.
WhereSign in → Administrative portal
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Planning / Building · 2
Public Procurement · 1
Public Service · 1
Tax / Customs · 1
§02 · Opening a recourse
Because standing is where these cases die.
The type is chosen first — and where a type has a classic trap, the tile carries the product’s own standing warning: the Article 146 §2 interest test, the Tender Review Authority tier, the choice between recourse and the immigration portal. A trap named at creation is a trap avoided.
WhereSidebar → + → New Administrative Case
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Promotion / transfer / discipline decisions of public officers
StandingDirect + personal legitimate interest required (Article 146 §2).
Tax assessments, VAT decisions, customs determinations
Town-planning refusals, building-permit conditions, zoning
Challenges to tender awards under N. 73(I)/2016
StandingTender-Review Authority (ΑΑΑΔΣ) tier before Administrative Court — confirm exhaustion of remedies.
CySEC, telecoms, energy, gambling, professional licence refusals
Disciplinary decisions of public-sector or professional bodies
Naturalisation refusals when challenged by recourse (vs intra-CRMD)
StandingUse Article 146 recourse when intra-administrative remedies are exhausted; otherwise use the immigration portal.
Pension / disability / unemployment benefit refusals
Health, medical-council, professional-body regulatory decisions
Other administrative-law matter
Promotion / transfer / discipline decisions of public officers
Tax assessments, VAT decisions, customs determinations
Town-planning refusals, building-permit conditions, zoning
Challenges to tender awards under N. 73(I)/2016
CySEC, telecoms, energy, gambling, professional licence refusals
Disciplinary decisions of public-sector or professional bodies
Naturalisation refusals when challenged by recourse (vs intra-CRMD)
Pension / disability / unemployment benefit refusals
Health, medical-council, professional-body regulatory decisions
Other administrative-law matter
§03 · The file
Eight sections, five stages, in the order the work happens.
The portal’s stages run intake, objection stage, recourse filed, judgment & appeal and aftermath. The objection stage is there because many decisions must be challenged inside the administration before a court will look at them.
WhereOpen any matter → the header and tab strip
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Administrative Court · Statutory Basis: Article 146 of the Constitution · Standing: direct and personal legitimate interest (Article 146 §2)
Where the matter has got to — the stage stepper
Objection Stage — hierarchical objection or review before the administrative authority.
The work itself — eight sections, in case order
§04 · Intake — Ανάθεση
Record, upload or type. Review before anything runs.
Administrative intake uses the same room as every other portal: record the meeting, upload the audio, or type your notes — and the transcript is yours to correct before any analysis is run on it.
WhereCase → Intake
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Recording or uploading requires the client’s consent first (GDPR, Law 125(I)/2018). Typed notes do not.
Suggested documents:
The notification envelope is on the list for a reason: it is often the only evidence of when the client actually learned of the decision.
It does not just summarize the complaint — it maps it onto the grounds of annulment the Grounds section will ask you to prove.
Read (or show) the following statement to the client before any recording or audio processing.
§05 · Overview — Επισκόπηση
Who is challenging whom, and on what dates.
Overview answers the questions asked about a recourse more than any others: who is challenging whom, over which decision, and can this client bring it. The days left sit in the case header as a colored badge, on every tab at once — standing is here, because it is the objection that arrives first.
WhereCase → Overview
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Α. Α.
Sample Planning Authority
The portal gives standing its own field so the position is written down while the file is being opened — not reconstructed when the authority takes the point.
Where the window has run, the card says Passed rather than showing a negative number. A file that is out of time should look out of time.
§06 · Decision — Απόφαση
The decision date, and the knowledge date.
The section holds the decision under challenge — who took it, when, and what it says. It asks for the decision date and, separately, the knowledge date: the day the applicant became aware of it. The 75-day window runs from knowledge, and the product uses the decision date only when knowledge is not recorded.
WhereCase → Decision
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Set the knowledge date in the Decision tab to compute the deadline.
Pre-Recourse — what was tried inside the administration
For tax and VAT decisions the objection to the Commissioner is usually the first step.
A decision dated 2 June that reached the client on 9 June gives seven more days. The portal records both and computes from knowledge, which is what Article 146 §3 measures.
The product says so in its own words, and offers to treat the internal outcome as a new knowledge date only where that is right — a decision for counsel, not for software.
§07 · Grounds — Λόγοι
Annulment Grounds Builder (Article 146).
A recourse is only as good as its grounds. The builder lays out the six grounds of annulment with the test each one states, and you record the evidence under it — so the weak ground is visible while there is still time to evidence it.
WhereCase → Grounds
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
The deciding authority lacked legal power to take this decision — wrong organ, expired delegation, or jurisdiction outside its statutory mandate.
On this fileMarked unclear
The authority acted for a purpose foreign to its statutory mandate, or weighed irrelevant criteria.
On this fileMarked met
Right to be heard not respected, inadequate inquiry, biased panel, missing consultation, defective notification.
On this fileMarked met
The decision fails to state reasons sufficient to allow judicial review — boilerplate, contradictory, or addressing no actual evidence.
On this fileMarked met
Decision (or underlying statute) breaches a Part-II Constitution right — equality, property, due process, family life, etc.
On this fileMarked unclear
Decision rests on a fact materially wrong on the face of the record — wrong date, wrong figures, mis-identified person/property.
On this fileMarked met
§08 · Deadline — Προθεσμία
And forty-two more, if it goes on appeal.
This is the section the portal exists for. The 75-day recourse window under Article 146 §3 is computed from the knowledge date, and the 42-day appeal window to the Administrative Court of Appeal is computed from the first-instance judgment.
WhereCase → Deadline
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
What the clock is computed from
Because three different dates can be argued to start it, because an internal step may or may not pause it, and because the consequence of getting it wrong is that nothing else on the file matters.
The product states it plainly: enforcement continues unless suspended. A client who thinks the recourse stopped the demolition needs to hear that on day one.
§09 · Documents — Έγγραφα
The decision, the file, the reports.
Upload is shared across the firm, but the categories are not: an administrative file sorts under orders and judgments, official reports, communications, affidavits and registry records. Contracts and financial documents belong to other portals.
WhereCase → Documents
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Everything the authority took into account, and everything it did not, is in the disclosed file. Reading it against the decision is exactly the work the grounds are built from.
A dated notification is what proves the knowledge date, which is what proves you are in time. It is a document, not a recollection.
§10 · Timeline — Χρονολόγιο
Two cards: the deadlines, and the chronology.
Every date the portal puts on a recourse arrives with the rule it comes from and a badge saying whether it is statutory or indicative.
WhereCase → Timeline
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Where a matter has none, the card reads “No deadlines yet”.
Dates you entered, plus events read out of the documents — merged, and de-duplicated where they describe the same thing.
§11 · Advisor — Σύμβουλος
Article 146, cited.
The administrative advisor is scoped to the matter it is opened in and answers in the currency of the practice: which ground, which article, how many days are left. The statutory basis and standing hint carried by the case type are quoted into its prompt.
WhereCase → Advisor
Product demonstration · sample matter · no client data
Questions an administrative practitioner actually asks
Not “the decision may be challengeable” but manifest error of fact, 480 against 940, Article 146. That is the difference between a chatbot and something a public-law practitioner uses.
On whether an internal step resets the clock it says what the product records and stops. The dangerous answer here would be a confident one.
Next step
Take a refusal you are already challenging, put the decision date and the knowledge date in, and work the six grounds against the file. Ten minutes, and it is the honest test of whether this belongs in your practice.
JurisAI · thejurisai.com · Greek and English